• Feeds

    Subscribe in a reader

  • Ads

On Microsoft and Anti-Discrimination

Bravo to both Cyrus and Scoble for their recent comments lamenting Microsoft’s decision to pull support for Washington’s anti-discrimination bill.

When I got SteveB’s memo in my inbox yesterday, I was sad too. I recognize that Microsoft is a business, and that as a business we have certain priorities. Some things align clearly with throse priorities and some don’t. There wasn’t a direct business justification for supporting this bill, and in that respect I guess I can acknowledge the company’s decision not to lend official support for it. But still, I couldn’t help but feel that we’d passed up an opportunity to do some good in the world.

There’s no doubt that Microsoft is a progressive company when it comes to human rights. Our anti-discrimination policy is very strong, and it’s no secret that MS offers its employees same-sex domestic partner benefits. The company’s position regarding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is definitely public knowledge.

All we had to do was stand up in a public forum and tell the legislature what everyone already knew — that the bill under consideration aligned with Microsoft’s company values and internal policies. It wouldn’t have surprised anyone. And maybe – just maybe – that simple act of stating the obvious might have tipped the vote the other way.

It’s too bad that a company that’s about empowering people through great software isn’t also about empowering people through legislation that guarantees them a fundamental level of equality.

 

#1 Haacked on 4.24.2005 at 12:10 AM

Well said!Once again, a chance to lead is missed.Only this time, it's of more importance than whether or not you jump on this whole "internet" bandwagon.

#2 TSHAK on 4.26.2005 at 10:48 AM

(originally posted in response to http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/04/23.html#a9919)I usually don't like to get involved in these discussions due to the emotionally charged dialogue and lack of sound reasoning on either side. While I support this bill, that is not the issue at hand.Microsoft is a diverse company. A diverse company is bound to have diverse opinions on social matters. In order to respect those diverse opinions a company should not represent its employees with a unified opinion. The fact that there's so much debate over this issue illustrates why it is wise for a company to stay out of such issues. If Microsoft's employees feel so strongly about this issue, why haven't they (~50,000, not ~2) rallied in support for this bill? This isn't Microsoft's issue, it's _your_ issue, so take action! Many people that I've talked to who are outraged at Microsoft haven't even read the bill, or didn't even know about it until this issue became publicized. I think that Ballmer is being courageous in his true support for diversity because he knew very well that remaining neutral would cause a lot of unrest among those who feel strongly about this issue.